From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B946456B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:09:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6FE39BD13
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 036F2BD08
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:08:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC312430AE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:08:49 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20200720082621.1259558-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <03743256-396b-a35e-6151-9338b02cc0f7@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:08:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:79.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/79.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200720082621.1259558-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.011 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH qemu-server] fix #2857: restore: pass
 keyfile to pbs-restore
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:09:20 -0000

On 20.07.20 10:26, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
> if configured. otherwise restoring encrypted backups will be quite
> hard..
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Note: for restore to actually work, we need pbs-restore linked with a
> bumped libproxmox-backup-qemu which has all the recent changes w.r.t.
> encryption. we might want to bump pve-qemu-kvm as well to encode these
> breaking changes in package relations, or add a libproxmox-backup-qemu
> dependency in qemu-server?
>=20
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>=20
>

applied, thanks!