From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32051B0F2 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:58:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2F2A214E3 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:58:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:58:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB8D444777; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:58:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <03397d75-f6a4-2d7b-e943-bb5a1de60ac3@proxmox.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 11:58:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:108.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/108.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Fiona Ebner , "DERUMIER, Alexandre" References: <19713dd51749ed24a5ecda1c6930191ed8fc4c11.camel@groupe-cyllene.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] cluster resource scheduler question X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:58:55 -0000 Am 23/11/2022 um 10:09 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> I'm not sure to understand, but the video seem to say that vm is >> migrated to the least "loaded" node. > yes, the video is misleading there. The static node CPU and memory > values and the configured CPU and memory for guests will be used to > approximate the real usage. > Not really misleading. It's the least loaded node, there's just more ways to determine load and the current mode is for static-load (vs. dynamic runtime load, planned for a next release). Am 22/11/2022 um 17:43 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre: > I'm not sure about the logic, but if we only look at number of total > cpus && memory without current usage, the biggest node will always be > choose ? Well yes, until it's "filled" enough for other nodes to be more favorable, a "bigger" node can host more after all. Am 23/11/2022 um 11:18 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre: > (BTW, I don't see the repo in proxmox git ?) fixed now, thanks for the reminder