From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963F71FF172
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue,  1 Apr 2025 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E9A523374C;
	Tue,  1 Apr 2025 15:44:54 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <02e2f3d6-8917-4124-92fc-af6cda14e421@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:44:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
References: <20250327151718.1084841-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com>
 <20250327151718.1084841-7-c.heiss@proxmox.com>
 <bf26e451-0771-49c3-9ea7-2064c0a9835b@proxmox.com>
 <D8VC42F4R5VW.23126SXQH3CVG@proxmox.com>
 <10268f72-0c29-4eff-902f-db8721faf576@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <10268f72-0c29-4eff-902f-db8721faf576@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.011 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 6/6] fix #5811: auto: add option
 to retrieve FQDN from DHCP configuration
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On 4/1/25 15:29, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> On 4/1/25 15:25, Christoph Heiss wrote:
>> The file directly from `git format-patch` looks fine, with no extra
>> newlines. Sent the patches using `git send-email` as usual, so not sure
>> where it went wrong.
>> I'll see if I can reproduce it locally for me and fix it up for a v2.
> 
> I think this happened for me as well once with the firewall patch series
> and the mailing list trims / truncates overly long lines iirc.

Hm, interesting! Just checked against the patch that created the JSON 
file [0] seems fine there, but admittedly the patch there is encoded in 
base64, could that be a reason for this?

[0] 
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20240417123108.212720-14-a.lauterer@proxmox.com/


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel