From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BAB9792BE for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5FCC723D89 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B74B023D7B for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8BE7042112; Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <01e6faf2-cb15-d021-bf50-f5606ba1909d@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_Ko=c4=87?= References: From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Some translation strings missing X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 07:12:03 -0000 Hi! On 04.05.21 07:57, Daniel Ko=C4=87 wrote: > I just finished full Polish translation, but found that some strings > can't be translated. I made a quick search and it looks like some of > them are not yet gettextized: >=20 > $ grep -r -e "fieldLabel: '" -e "text: '" * | grep -v gettext | grep -v= > "do not localize" | wc -l > 228 Some of those are things like "OSD" or "Ceph" which cannot be translated,=20 some are where one probably could argue for and some are def. just missed= =2E >=20 > (It includes PBS and PMG messages, since all the translation messages > are merged into one file eventually.) >=20 > Is it possible to make a patch which fixes it? Do you want to take a shot at this and send a patch? It shouldn't be too = hard, relatively speaking. https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Developer_Documentation#Working_on_the_code >=20 > This list is not complete, there are some other missing messages like: >=20 > * tooltip for documentation link for PVE and PMG (PBS does not have > this tip) > * "Subscription" section title on PBS dashboard > * Ceph installation wizard text The latter was not made a gettext as it's a long text, really different from the other classic field or button label texts. It changed a few time= s already, and it's way harder to review for correctness. Further, we currently cannot detect gettext instances spanning over multiple lines, s= o the parser would need adaption. That's not saying I'd reject making it a gettext in general, just stating= the reasoning for initially not doing so. >=20 > It would be great to make them also translatable. >=20 cheers, Thomas