From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78E91737D2 for ; Sat, 28 May 2022 09:09:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 65FF51D4D1 for ; Sat, 28 May 2022 09:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E5D5B1D4C5 for ; Sat, 28 May 2022 09:09:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B5AC6429FB for ; Sat, 28 May 2022 09:09:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <012357f5-13ae-e388-2962-109390dabe29@proxmox.com> Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 09:09:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/101.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Matthias Heiserer References: <20220527114810.510501-1-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> <20220527114810.510501-2-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220527114810.510501-2-m.heiserer@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.995 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 qemu-server 1/2] bump pve-common X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 07:09:59 -0000 This isn't bumping the version of pve-common, but the build-dependency only (why not the installation dependency too?). The common commit subject style used for such things, as can be seen by checking git log on debian/control, is: "d/control: bump build-dependency of pve-common" Then a short sentence in the message: "we require the new for XYZ" On 27/05/2022 13:48, Matthias Heiserer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matthias Heiserer > --- > > Changes from v3: > None > > Changes from v1/v2: > new patch > > > debian/control | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index af258db..2898593 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 12~), > libio-multiplex-perl, > libjson-c-dev, > libpve-cluster-perl, > - libpve-common-perl (>= 7.1-3), > + libpve-common-perl (>= 7.1-4), > libpve-guest-common-perl (>= 4.1-1), > libpve-storage-perl (>= 6.1-7), > libtest-mockmodule-perl,