From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E175973C27 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:53:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D77A02D97E for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:53:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id F391F2D973 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C664E43923 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:53:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <00b0dab2-05d9-b746-f9dd-e49ed6e1fb54@proxmox.com> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:53:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> References: <20220530124014.2477717-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> <27f9614c-1f35-3496-0864-d6c57c27eb3e@proxmox.com> From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <27f9614c-1f35-3496-0864-d6c57c27eb3e@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.933 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.876 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 0/3] network: update & reword X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 12:53:58 -0000 On 5/30/22 14:50, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 30/05/2022 um 14:40 schrieb Aaron Lauterer: >> - ifupdown2 is default now, we can remove the install guide etc > > only for people coming from the PVE iso, but not for those installing PVE on top of > a vanilla Debian installation. Albeit, one could argue that we could still remove > it here and add a recommendation for installing ifupdown2 in the respective wiki[0]. Ah thanks. I'll reword it a bit and keep the install guide (maybe a bit shorter as a note) for those people, just in case and update the wiki page as well. > > [0]: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Install_Proxmox_VE_on_Debian_11_Bullseye