From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366601FF164 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:12:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ABD78DD5A; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:12:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:12:15 +0100 From: Christoph Heiss To: Markus Frank Message-ID: References: <20240624090850.4683-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pve-common/proxmox-perl-rs/pmg-api/pmg-gui v3 0/8] fix #3892: OpenID X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pmg-devel" On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:19:38PM +0100, Markus Frank wrote: > Thanks for the review and sorry for the late reply. > > Comments inline: > > On 2024-10-09 13:30, Christoph Heiss wrote: > > Just tested this series using Keycloak 26.0.0 as an OpenID provider. > > [..] > > > > I noticed however that there seems to be no dedicated PAM realm in the > > login window, only PMG authentication server - but you can still login > > with PAM credentials. These two should be real separate realms, much > > like we have it for PVE/PBS. > But you can only login as root with PAM afaict. > Should we separate it just for the root user or are we planning to add PAM login for other users? Hm, not sure - or at least not for me to decide. But - it was a bit surprising/confusing, since you can set PMG as authentication realm and then use root (at) pam as username. Especially also when comparing to PVE/PBS, how it works there. I guess just for the sake of consistency between products would be worth it to split them. Although user creation/management for such a PAM realm can be left for later, as to not explode this series. _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel