From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E247901DB for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:41:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1CDF237BE for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 55D6543CB3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:35:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:35:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:105.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/105.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Stoiko Ivanov , pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20220830083011.43670-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20220830083011.43670-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.004 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api] fix #3915: remove obsolete /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/75pmgconf X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:41:28 -0000 Am 30/08/2022 um 10:30 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov: > this was forgotten when introducing the more flexible kernel-keeping > logic with proxmox-boot-tool (in 6.4). > > while this file is present no pve-kernel gets autoremoved. > > using debian/conffiles (deb-conffiles(5)) logic for this following the > recommendation from (dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) - for dpkg > 1.20.6). needs also debhelper >= 13.5~ to ensure that conffiles is actually shipped by the package[0], for us that isn't a real problem as we already backported that version and uploaded it to our devel repo a while ago, but the current stable (i.e., non-backports) lintian 2.104.0 is still confused about this and throws in three errors w.r.t conffiles, so we'd need to depend on the 2.115.1 version from backports, which doesn't results in false positive errors. Would be fine for me, it's both easily encodable in d/control after all, albeit [0] also mentions: > For bullseye, my recommendation would be to stick with "rm_conffile" in > debian/.maintscripts. Which, I think, stems mostly from the fact that debian hasn't the flexibility we have w.r.t. to enforcing the use of bpo packages for building (which we already to for some other things, so nothing really new). Note that I actually didn't check for building with the default debhelper, so if it works there, and that without causing lintian to choke (which would explain you not noticing this issue), I'd still see that as issue (as our default and target debhelper *is* 13.5) [0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/08/msg00569.html