From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648FC6985D
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:14:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5B43C2AD7F
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:14:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EA2E12AD71
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:14:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B347E4638B
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:14:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <8b932c18-b9b5-b91d-7633-674151ab4042@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:14:09 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:87.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/87.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20210309141401.19237-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
 <20210309141401.19237-16-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
 <cfb9e092-b506-64ed-9fc7-84f1f99b2a72@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <cfb9e092-b506-64ed-9fc7-84f1f99b2a72@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.048 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 5/7] add ACME account panel
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:14:11 -0000

On 11.03.21 14:51, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> high level question/remark:
> 
> would it not be nicer if we set the acmeUrl
> in Proxmox.Utils to e.g., /config/acme
> and overwrite that in pve ? (like
> we do with task descriptions?)
> 
> this way the caller does not have to concern
> itself with the url and we only set it one time per product
> 
I like the idea in general, but the Utils class are quite overused/crowded
already, and this is rather not a Util but a config, maybe a Proxmox.Config
class could be added and used?