From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA77E6D4F8 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A77BEB7C6 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay.ginernet.com (mailer1.ginernet.com [5.134.119.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2BDC6B7B8 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:06:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from interno.ginernet.com (ginernet.com [5.134.116.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.ginernet.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 6F1BD22F46 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:06:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ginernet.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dTFCiJws5xif76F173nua1Eiyvseuo+xHlkqWy23QLU=; b=tKFJLXoi3aGpejY7EaFdb4HkSb o8xxrcn+3k8byq7X/KKtgo6P2ZA056BaxLgNCcmMFavukZ4oqHjI20fBESm1O9r/+wMo/i04pl3Xt 5+aW91702Fe2QoMvIhcsIMx1KNZ52xITHJTXH61NZ2rULchraBxer8pd47GNZWOy7K/KWH9y4hQof d4vx/cWx8azuBCY96pjdf+8aJPvQOfYeFa+SHrXrnLNJS0W6o+z9thEcAOo6+atyxEN78nyynlInu 5Gr9z3hW7iCsZXXNC5LdN0pJPKcoNwOc3AFC58zqTXli58IPTWF+G2A6b35QWEX4NnCE97OwhOMBt FNriM5zQ==; To: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=c3=a9_Manuel_Giner?= Message-ID: <85ccbd64-2640-53ca-3f53-f1768441ac41@ginernet.com> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:06:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - interno.ginernet.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.proxmox.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ginernet.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: interno.ginernet.com: authenticated_id: jm@ginernet.com X-Authenticated-Sender: interno.ginernet.com: jm@ginernet.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [ginernet.com, proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] BUG? "change vnc password" return error in PVE v7 X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:06:46 -0000 Sorry, I was on the wrong site to report this bug. On 13/08/2021 14:31, José Manuel Giner wrote: > Hello, we are upgrading our first node to PVE v7 and have found that we > are unable to make VNC connections. > > Since PVE v4, we have implemented this solution: > https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/VNC_Client_Access > > However, when running it in PVE v7, we received this error: > > # change vnc 0.0.0.0:100,password > Expected 'password' after 'vnc' > > Is it a bug that should be fixed or our fault? > > External VNC connections is something we need, it's very important to us. > > Thank you. > -- José Manuel Giner https://ginernet.com