From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43D984AB
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:45:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A080E4CB7
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:44:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E08814CA8
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:44:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF005428DB
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:44:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3f6f1f1b-4096-5ab0-8997-26712b4b1437@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:44:50 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20220422081546.20112-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220422081546.20112-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 1.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -1.857 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [RFC pve-common] procfs tools: handle proc/stat
 without guest values
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:45:22 -0000

Am 22.04.22 um 10:15 schrieb Fabian Ebner:
> PMG is often run as a container, and in certain environments
> (Parallels?), the last two values (guest and guest_nice) might not be

"(Parallels?)" should be replaced with "(like Virtuozzo 7)" in the
commit message.

Quoting from https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/106896/post-466350 :
> The kernel running below the Container is using Virtuozzo 7 with Kernel 3.10.0.
> On the Hostnode all 10 Digits are reachable. Only in the Container they are missing.
> The Patch you have sent to the mailing list is working. Now the error doesn't occurs any more.