From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7221FF15C for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:19:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 860101FFCF; Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:19:47 +0100 (CET) From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> To: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:18:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20250219121851.110090-2-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250219121851.110090-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> References: <20250219121851.110090-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [disclaimer.pm] Subject: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v3 1/5] ruledb: disclaimer: simplify update-case X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pmg-devel" <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> as one object(_id) belongs is of one object type, we can safely remove all associated attribut entries from the database at once instead of running 2 separate statements to delete each individually noticed this while adding new attribut entries to the content-type check. Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> --- src/PMG/RuleDB/Disclaimer.pm | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/PMG/RuleDB/Disclaimer.pm b/src/PMG/RuleDB/Disclaimer.pm index 574f62e..cb9b5fb 100644 --- a/src/PMG/RuleDB/Disclaimer.pm +++ b/src/PMG/RuleDB/Disclaimer.pm @@ -113,11 +113,9 @@ sub save { "UPDATE Object SET Value = ? WHERE ID = ?", undef, $value, $self->{id}); - for my $prop (qw(top separator)) { - $ruledb->{dbh}->do( - "DELETE FROM Attribut WHERE Name = ? and Object_ID = ?", - undef, $prop, $self->{id}); - } + $ruledb->{dbh}->do( + "DELETE FROM Attribut WHERE Object_ID = ?", + undef, $self->{id}); } else { # insert -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel