From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD1794FB8
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:17:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 63DA01C986
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:17:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:17:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A086544E3F
 for <pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:17:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:17:22 +0100
From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
To: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Cc: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Message-ID: <20240223181722.662d5bf7@rosa.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240219130036.445696-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
References: <20240219130036.445696-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.082 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH] dkim: document dkim_use_domain
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
 <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, 
 <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:17:55 -0000

Thanks for addressing this!

comment inline:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:00:36 +0100
Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Continuation of https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/2024-February/002714.html.
> 
>  pmgconfig.adoc | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/pmgconfig.adoc b/pmgconfig.adoc
> index bf3887e..0acb8e9 100644
> --- a/pmgconfig.adoc
> +++ b/pmgconfig.adoc
> @@ -585,6 +585,13 @@ Controls whether all outbound mail should get signed or only mails from domains
>  listed in `/etc/pmg/dkim/domains`, if it exists and `/etc/pmg/domains`
>  otherwise.
>  
> +Select Signing Domain::
> +
> +Determines whether to DKIM sign emails using the domain found in the envelope
> +from or the from header in the body of the email. Some emails do not set a
here I'd probably add a reference to RFC5321 and RFC5322 respectively 
> +return path and it is desirable to sign them using the domain found in the from
I personally would rather phrase that as:
`Some emails are sent with an empty envelope sender` instead of not
setting a return path (the Return-Path header is usually set by some MTA
on the transport-path of the mail.
> +header.
> +
Additionally - I'd mention that DMARC (with reference to the RFC+section)
needs the header-from as domain in certain situations.


>  These settings are saved to the 'admin' subsection in `/etc/pmg/pmg.conf`,
>  using the following configuration keys:
>