From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC041FF0E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:10:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 67EA72133E; Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:10:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Stoiko Ivanov To: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Nicolas Frey Subject: applied: [PATCH pmg-docs 1/1] faq: add warning about using apt upgrade Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:09:52 +0200 Message-ID: <178396253842.30177.1364635613615499806.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260709142606.363114-1-n.frey@proxmox.com> References: <20260709142606.363114-1-n.frey@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783962591758 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.350 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: CEBNWH3W4V557WZ5ITQBW4W3KIZY25MR X-Message-ID-Hash: CEBNWH3W4V557WZ5ITQBW4W3KIZY25MR X-MailFrom: s.ivanov@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Thanks for providing the patch for PMG as well! On Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:26:06 +0200, Nicolas Frey wrote: > as it has increasingly come up in enterprise support and is generally an > easy foot gun for people coming from other Debian-based distros. > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] faq: add warning about using apt upgrade commit: 8d1f840ac89fb9991160f3efc2fb98ee3baa915e