From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686C21FF191
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:46:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06A8CFDD;
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:46:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:45:55 +0100 (CET)
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Message-ID: <1206226125.10150.1740141955656@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250218161905.17224-11-m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20250218161905.17224-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
<20250218161905.17224-11-m.frank@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev73
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.045 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [proxmox.com]
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v5 10/10] add panel for realms to
User Management
X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion
<pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>,
<mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>,
<mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pmg-devel" <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
> Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com> hat am 18.02.2025 17:19 CET geschrieben:
>
>
> Make the realm configuration available in PMG and disable LDAP/AD
> realms for now and use the name oidc instead of openid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
> ---
> js/UserManagement.js | 6 ++++++
> js/Utils.js | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/js/UserManagement.js b/js/UserManagement.js
> index 65fabbf..54493b1 100644
> --- a/js/UserManagement.js
> +++ b/js/UserManagement.js
> @@ -34,5 +34,11 @@ Ext.define('PMG.UserManagement', {
> itemId: 'pop',
> iconCls: 'fa fa-reply-all',
> },
> + {
> + xtype: 'pmxAuthView',
> + title: gettext('Realms'),
> + itemId: 'domains',
> + iconCls: 'fa fa-address-book-o',
> + },
> ],
> });
> diff --git a/js/Utils.js b/js/Utils.js
> index 9b5f054..055b938 100644
> --- a/js/Utils.js
> +++ b/js/Utils.js
> @@ -851,6 +851,29 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Utils', {
> constructor: function() {
> var me = this;
>
> + // use oidc instead of openid
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.oidc = Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.openid;
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.oidc.useTypeInUrl = false;
> + delete Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.openid;
unless we want to rename it to oidc everywhere, this makes me think that it's not a good idea to deviate from the existing naming scheme in PMG?
> +
> + // Disable LDAP/AD as a realm until LDAP/AD login is implemented
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.ldap.add = false;
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.ad.add = false;
> +
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.pmg = {
> + add: false,
> + edit: false,
> + pwchange: false,
> + sync: false,
> + };
> +
> + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.pam = {
> + add: false,
> + edit: false,
> + pwchange: false,
> + sync: false,
> + };
> +
> // do whatever you want here
> Proxmox.Utils.override_task_descriptions({
> applycustomscores: ['', gettext('Apply custom SpamAssassin scores')],
> --
> 2.39.5
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pmg-devel mailing list
> pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel
_______________________________________________
pmg-devel mailing list
pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel