From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686C21FF191 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:46:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 06A8CFDD; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:46:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 13:45:55 +0100 (CET) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> To: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <1206226125.10150.1740141955656@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20250218161905.17224-11-m.frank@proxmox.com> References: <20250218161905.17224-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> <20250218161905.17224-11-m.frank@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev73 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.045 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-gui v5 10/10] add panel for realms to User Management X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion <pmg-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pmg-devel>, <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pmg-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel>, <mailto:pmg-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pmg-devel" <pmg-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> > Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com> hat am 18.02.2025 17:19 CET geschrieben: > > > Make the realm configuration available in PMG and disable LDAP/AD > realms for now and use the name oidc instead of openid. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com> > --- > js/UserManagement.js | 6 ++++++ > js/Utils.js | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/js/UserManagement.js b/js/UserManagement.js > index 65fabbf..54493b1 100644 > --- a/js/UserManagement.js > +++ b/js/UserManagement.js > @@ -34,5 +34,11 @@ Ext.define('PMG.UserManagement', { > itemId: 'pop', > iconCls: 'fa fa-reply-all', > }, > + { > + xtype: 'pmxAuthView', > + title: gettext('Realms'), > + itemId: 'domains', > + iconCls: 'fa fa-address-book-o', > + }, > ], > }); > diff --git a/js/Utils.js b/js/Utils.js > index 9b5f054..055b938 100644 > --- a/js/Utils.js > +++ b/js/Utils.js > @@ -851,6 +851,29 @@ Ext.define('PMG.Utils', { > constructor: function() { > var me = this; > > + // use oidc instead of openid > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.oidc = Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.openid; > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.oidc.useTypeInUrl = false; > + delete Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.openid; unless we want to rename it to oidc everywhere, this makes me think that it's not a good idea to deviate from the existing naming scheme in PMG? > + > + // Disable LDAP/AD as a realm until LDAP/AD login is implemented > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.ldap.add = false; > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.ad.add = false; > + > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.pmg = { > + add: false, > + edit: false, > + pwchange: false, > + sync: false, > + }; > + > + Proxmox.Schema.authDomains.pam = { > + add: false, > + edit: false, > + pwchange: false, > + sync: false, > + }; > + > // do whatever you want here > Proxmox.Utils.override_task_descriptions({ > applycustomscores: ['', gettext('Apply custom SpamAssassin scores')], > -- > 2.39.5 > > > > _______________________________________________ > pmg-devel mailing list > pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel _______________________________________________ pmg-devel mailing list pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel