From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D920C0525 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:32:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 37E7E36008 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:32:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CFF7490AA for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:32:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:32:23 +0100 (CET) From: Dietmar Maurer To: Dominik Csapak , Markus Frank , pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com Message-ID: <1020479743.2231.1704897143739@webmail.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240110115654.763820-1-m.frank@proxmox.com> <477134155.2147.1704891166704@webmail.proxmox.com> <411ba218-cfea-4075-bfb0-bee51cbc6051@proxmox.com> <1362643070.2197.1704895037948@webmail.proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev57 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.360 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api] config: adjust max_filters calculation to reflect current memory usage X-BeenThere: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Mail Gateway development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:32:55 -0000 > sure, but getting the filter oom killed (like the user in the forum did) also limits mail throughput Just keep in mind that low-memory systems now runs with less parallel filters. If users reports performance/throughput problem we have to suggest to add more RAM... Note: The code was written at a time when RAM <= 2GB