From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1051FF15C
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  5 Feb 2025 14:03:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0477BB6FC;
	Wed,  5 Feb 2025 14:03:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:03:55 +0100
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <qxua3bqdlqcdgg2eebodmxrybokpt23w53cvdt3qaekbvewzee@yuas5uessjhf>
References: <20250204131449.125443-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20250204131449.125443-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.084 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [schema2rust.pm]
Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-api-types 1/1] generator: support
 methods with no parameters
X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pdm-devel>, 
 <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pdm-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel>, 
 <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pdm-devel" <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> Some methods (e.g. 'PUT cluster/sdn') do not take any input
> parameters. Support those methods by generating them with unit type as
> type for the input parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  pve-api-types/generator-lib/Schema2Rust.pm | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pve-api-types/generator-lib/Schema2Rust.pm b/pve-api-types/generator-lib/Schema2Rust.pm
> index 068517e..554341d 100644
> --- a/pve-api-types/generator-lib/Schema2Rust.pm
> +++ b/pve-api-types/generator-lib/Schema2Rust.pm
> @@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ my sub print_method_with_body : prototype($$$$$) {
>          my ($arg, $def) = @$url_arg;
>          print {$out} "    $arg: $def->{type},\n";
>      }
> -    print {$out} "    params: $def->{input_type},\n";
> +    my $input = $def->{input_type} // '()';
> +    print {$out} "    params: $input,\n";

This would produce an explicit parameter of type `()` - why not just
drop `params` when we have none?

>      my $output = $def->{output_type} // '()';
>      print {$out} ") -> Result<$output, Error> {\n";
>      if ($trait) {
> -- 
> 2.39.5


_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel