From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A190F1FF14C for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 12:12:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A0ACC6EEC; Fri, 29 May 2026 12:12:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 12:11:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 3/4] ui: factor out the 'empty_state' render helper To: Dominik Csapak , pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260529065506.222086-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20260529065506.222086-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <20260529065506.222086-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1780049469192 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: UPFJURQZBE5BQQHFQILMXV2TBGGVFS6S X-Message-ID-Hash: UPFJURQZBE5BQQHFQILMXV2TBGGVFS6S X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 29.05.26 um 08:54 schrieb Dominik Csapak: > this is a nice looking hint for empty grids/panels that we should reuse > across the various pages so move it to the renderer module. nice, thx, wanted also to a run to apply this on more places; it has IMO a very good ROI on UX vs cost.