From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091841FF16B for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:54:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 44087A24F; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:55:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 09:55:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Shannon Sterz , Lukas Wagner References: <20251106124334.189955-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <20251106124334.189955-6-s.sterz@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762505687442 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager 2/3] ui: make NodeStatusPanel available as a widget X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Cc: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" Am 07.11.25 um 09:37 schrieb Shannon Sterz: > On Fri Nov 7, 2025 at 8:31 AM CET, Lukas Wagner wrote: >> - The widget appears a bit too dense/crowded, at least compared to the >> other widgets that we already have. I think this mostly due to the >> three buttons, as well as the long kernel version string, on my PDM >> dev host this is >> >> Linux 6.14.8-2-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC PMX 6.14.8-2 (2025-07-22T10:04Z) >> >> which appears to be quite a bit longer than what we show in PVE/PBS: >> >> Linux 6.14.11-4-pve (2025-10-10T08:04Z) > > just a small note, this is how seem to display this information > throughout pdm at least, so i'd keep that for now. Fine for now, but I'd prefer to align this to the new variant, which PVE adopted two years ago. For most users the pre-emption mode of their kernel is really useless detail (there are many other kconfig options that have a similar impact), and frankly I do not really get why it's included in uname, but not our thing to change - displaying only the most relevant here should be done in any case (but can be a follow-up to sync the look over all places). https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=be04f8ee8af61eaa3730ae74e6e3c7d4266474ca [...] > alright i'll make the fingerprint opt-in and revert to the tab > based approach from v1 then. thx! _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel