From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01AA91FF16B for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2601533D75; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:23:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:22:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion , Stefan Hanreich References: <20250822134942.380480-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <20250822134942.380480-18-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20250822134942.380480-18-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756214561140 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [tasks.rs, utils.rs] Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-yew-comp v2 1/1] sdn: add descriptions for sdn tasks X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" this probably fits better in pdm directly? we have the most pve task descriptions in ui/src/tasks.rs proxmox-yew-comp tries to be product agnostic and i guess this is only pve specific? (e.g. no evpn zones on pbs ;) ) On 8/22/25 3:50 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich > --- > src/utils.rs | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/utils.rs b/src/utils.rs > index 1a4ad40..3d5def1 100644 > --- a/src/utils.rs > +++ b/src/utils.rs > @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ pub fn init_task_descr_table_base() { > register_task_description("srvstop", (tr!("Service"), tr!("Stop"))); > register_task_description("srvrestart", (tr!("Service"), tr!("Restart"))); > register_task_description("srvreload", (tr!("Service"), tr!("Reload"))); > + > + register_task_description("create_zone", tr!("Create EVPN VRF (Zone)")); > + register_task_description("create_vnet", tr!("Create EVPN VNet")); > } > > /// Uses information from the given [`UPID`] to render the task description with [`format_task_description`] _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel