From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397941FF17E for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C4A5F14567; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta To: Shannon Sterz , Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion , Dominik Csapak References: <20250924145137.407070-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <20250924145137.407070-6-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <5d896cd1-2e37-463b-aafd-a9eb833fd254@proxmox.com> <9cc35cf3-208b-4bcf-b24a-3544221e1f8c@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1759419529446 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.026 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_SHORT 0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [docs.rs, mozilla.org] Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH yew-comp 2/2] token_panel: implement a token panel X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" Am 02.10.25 um 17:29 schrieb Shannon Sterz: > imo the proper solution however is to use the new clipboard api that is > now in stable web-sys [1,2]. fabian packaged a new web-sys version this > week, so i'd adapt to it unless someone objects to that. Sounds good to me. > note that `execCommand` used by copy_to_clipboard is > deprecated [2]. > > [1]: https://docs.rs/web-sys/0.3.76/web_sys/struct.Clipboard.html > [2]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Clipboard/writeText > [3]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/execCommand > >> Btw. I know this mirrors the original and I added the copy button there, >> but nowadays I'd prefer having a icon-only+tooltip button to the right of >> the input field for both fields. > makes sense, i can look into that while i'm at it. but imo, we should > come up with a more consistent way of treating buttons with icons in > general. most buttons in pdm don't use any icons at all. FWIW, If there's a potential icon with clear meaning I always favor having them, it ads additional visual distinction that helps UX. But I do not think that what I meant here needs us to rethink the overall approach, this is something more specific, especially as it'd be icon-only. _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel