From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD66F1FF0E7
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 40C43214A7;
	Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:57:21 +0200
Message-Id: <DJUP1YVYHQWV.IJ6RCBNR41JC@proxmox.com>
Subject: applied: [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 1/1] faq: add warning
 about using apt upgrade
From: "Lukas Wagner" <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: "Nicolas Frey" <n.frey@proxmox.com>, <pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty
References: <20260709142623.363347-1-n.frey@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260709142623.363347-1-n.frey@proxmox.com>
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1783666630277
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.000 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment (newer systems)
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: BDUYTFEHBMYVKDIXWE6E34ZDF3S6LOZD
X-Message-ID-Hash: BDUYTFEHBMYVKDIXWE6E34ZDF3S6LOZD
X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pdm-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pdm-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pdm-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On Thu Jul 9, 2026 at 4:26 PM CEST, Nicolas Frey wrote:
> as it has increasingly come up in enterprise support and is generally an
> easy foot gun for people coming from other Debian-based distros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frey <n.frey@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
>     A similar patch that adds this warning was recently applied to PVE,
>     see commit 86bddb2e3d39 in `pve-docs` for more context
>
>  docs/faq.rst | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/faq.rst b/docs/faq.rst
> index d4ba9b50..3d8ecd3f 100644
> --- a/docs/faq.rst
> +++ b/docs/faq.rst
> @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ with:
>    apt update
>    apt full-upgrade
> =20
> +.. warning:: As Proxmox Datacenter Manager uses a rolling release model =
on
> +   top of Debian, performing an `apt upgrade` may result in a partially
> +   upgraded or broken package state. This is because `apt full-upgrade`
> +   can also remove existing packages to satisfy dependencies if needed,
> +   while `apt upgrade` cannot.
> +
>  .. note:: Always ensure you correctly setup the :ref:`package repositori=
es
>     <sysadmin_package_repositories>` and only continue with the actual up=
grade if `apt update` did
>     not hit any error.

Applied, thanks!