From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D9E1FF146 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 16:49:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 550B54A99; Tue, 26 May 2026 16:49:26 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 16:48:53 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Lukas Wagner" , Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager] ui: configuration: slightly clean up tool tips for subscrion registry X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20260526143027.482438-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Shannon Sterz" X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779806908513 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.111 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: RB2UTLZMKOBEFGKXRDHO7OA5CAOPLW3N X-Message-ID-Hash: RB2UTLZMKOBEFGKXRDHO7OA5CAOPLW3N X-MailFrom: s.sterz@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue May 26, 2026 at 4:47 PM CEST, Lukas Wagner wrote: > On Tue May 26, 2026 at 4:46 PM CEST, Shannon Sterz wrote: >>>> .tip(tr!( >>>> "Propose a one-key-per-node assignment for nodes = that have no active \ >>>> - subscription, then queue it pending Apply." >>>> + subscription, then queue applying it." >>>> )), >>> >>> Maybe >>> >>> "Propose a key assignment for nodes that have no active subscription, >>> allowing to queue it for applying the proposal later." >>> >>> could be a tad more clear? Although it might be a bit long for a >>> tooltip... >>> >>> The remaining changes look good to me, I think quoting the 'action' >>> looks nicer in the tooltip. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner >> >> Maybe: >> >> "Propose a key assignment for nodes that have no active subscription= and queue its application." >> >> ? > > Sounds good to me :) will send a v2 to in a minute then :)