From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C9F1FF146 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 16:48:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BD0F4912; Tue, 26 May 2026 16:48:16 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 16:47:43 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Shannon Sterz" , "Lukas Wagner" , Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager] ui: configuration: slightly clean up tool tips for subscrion registry X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260526143027.482438-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779806838680 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.053 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: IMUTHECLKEQN2L6UQ3J3CJ66TKMZK7FY X-Message-ID-Hash: IMUTHECLKEQN2L6UQ3J3CJ66TKMZK7FY X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue May 26, 2026 at 4:46 PM CEST, Shannon Sterz wrote: >>> .tip(tr!( >>> "Propose a one-key-per-node assignment for nodes t= hat have no active \ >>> - subscription, then queue it pending Apply." >>> + subscription, then queue applying it." >>> )), >> >> Maybe >> >> "Propose a key assignment for nodes that have no active subscription, >> allowing to queue it for applying the proposal later." >> >> could be a tad more clear? Although it might be a bit long for a >> tooltip... >> >> The remaining changes look good to me, I think quoting the 'action' >> looks nicer in the tooltip. >> >> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wagner > > Maybe: > > "Propose a key assignment for nodes that have no active subscription = and queue its application." > > ? Sounds good to me :)