From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87E601FF146 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 13:04:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 16D341A570; Tue, 26 May 2026 13:04:43 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:04:05 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 2/2] ui: move global guest panel in the top level navigation From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Dominik Csapak" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260526102805.1977534-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20260526102805.1977534-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260526102805.1977534-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779793421353 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.053 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 4WXCDPDZ2KBQXKAF7GQXI6RL6ZL3X6Y5 X-Message-ID-Hash: 4WXCDPDZ2KBQXKAF7GQXI6RL6ZL3X6Y5 X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue May 26, 2026 at 12:27 PM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote: > It's a very useful view to have so don't hide it in the remotes tab > panel. > Makes sense to me, so Acked-by: Lukas Wagner On a tangent, at some point we probably have to rethink the tabs under "Remotes" anyways, I think they have the potential to become quite unwieldily once we add a couple more tabs there.