From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A89A1FF142 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2026 09:45:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 08DCD1778C; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:46:35 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 09:46:00 +0100 Message-Id: From: "Lukas Wagner" To: "Christoph Heiss" , Subject: applied: [PATCH datacenter-manager] docs: local-zfs: fix up hardware raid warning admonition X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2-dirty References: <20260227160205.1154940-2-c.heiss@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260227160205.1154940-2-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1772441138045 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.021 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.012 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 1.188 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.93 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 6PVK5VNCBTANWR27HRRBYUUCNBM2GC65 X-Message-ID-Hash: 6PVK5VNCBTANWR27HRRBYUUCNBM2GC65 X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri Feb 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM CET, Christoph Heiss wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss > --- > Seems this instance was simply overlooked during the recent formatting > fixes for this section. > > docs/local-zfs.rst | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/local-zfs.rst b/docs/local-zfs.rst > index 9b824cc..170ab9b 100644 > --- a/docs/local-zfs.rst > +++ b/docs/local-zfs.rst > @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ high quality ECC RAM. > If you use a dedicated cache and/or log disk, you should use an enterpri= se class SSD (for example, > Intel SSD DC S3700 Series). This can increase the overall performance si= gnificantly. > =20 > -IMPORTANT: Do not use ZFS on top of a hardware controller which has its = own cache management. ZFS > -needs to directly communicate with disks. An HBA adapter or something li= ke an LSI controller flashed > -in ``IT`` mode is recommended. > +.. IMPORTANT:: Do not use ZFS on top of a hardware controller which has = its own cache management. ZFS > + needs to directly communicate with disks. An HBA adapter or something = like an LSI controller flashed > + in ``IT`` mode is recommended. > =20 > =20 > ZFS Administration TIL about the word "admonition" :^) applied, thanks!