From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40BD1FF15C for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:44:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AFA60754; Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:44:24 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Shan Shaji" To: "Stefan Hanreich" , "Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20251014150358.553238-1-s.shaji@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1760701460863 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.035 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager 0/3] fix #6901: allow non root users to access the EVPN dashboard X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Wed Oct 15, 2025 at 5:26 PM CEST, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > We might want to to reimplement more granular permissions as well, while > we're at it. Guests have /remotes//guest/ for instance to > allow setting permissions on a per-guest level. > > Imo, nothing speaks against implementing permissions the same way as SDN > currently does, which would then be on PDM side: > > /remote//sdn/zones/ > /remote//sdn/zones// > /remote//sdn/controllers/ Thanks @Stefan for the review. Got it, Thank you for explaning it. I think it would be better to implement it in another patch series. WDYT? _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel