From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D820C1FF179 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 17:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 024E72433E; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 17:29:58 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 17:29:54 +0200 Message-Id: To: "Dominik Csapak" , "Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion" X-Mailer: aerc 0.20.0 References: <20250924145137.407070-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <20250924145137.407070-2-s.sterz@proxmox.com> <1acb29c7-678c-4b6e-bf07-243fc44b7eb2@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <1acb29c7-678c-4b6e-bf07-243fc44b7eb2@proxmox.com> From: "Shannon Sterz" X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1759332572352 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/3] access-control: refactor api module to be more hirachical X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Fri Sep 26, 2025 at 10:26 AM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote: > > > On 9/24/25 4:51 PM, Shannon Sterz wrote: >> this is mainly in preparation of factoring out more api endpoints >> related to access control. the refactoring is done in a way where >> users should not need to adapt. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz >> --- >> proxmox-access-control/src/{api.rs => api/acl.rs} | 0 >> proxmox-access-control/src/api/mod.rs | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) >> rename proxmox-access-control/src/{api.rs => api/acl.rs} (100%) >> create mode 100644 proxmox-access-control/src/api/mod.rs >> >> diff --git a/proxmox-access-control/src/api.rs b/proxmox-access-control/src/api/acl.rs >> similarity index 100% >> rename from proxmox-access-control/src/api.rs >> rename to proxmox-access-control/src/api/acl.rs >> diff --git a/proxmox-access-control/src/api/mod.rs b/proxmox-access-control/src/api/mod.rs >> new file mode 100644 >> index 00000000..59dc32e2 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/proxmox-access-control/src/api/mod.rs >> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ >> +mod tokens; >> +pub use tokens::{ >> + API_METHOD_DELETE_TOKEN, API_METHOD_GENERATE_TOKEN, API_METHOD_LIST_TOKENS, >> + API_METHOD_READ_TOKEN, API_METHOD_UPDATE_TOKEN, >> +}; >> + >> +mod acl; >> +pub use acl::{ACL_ROUTER, API_METHOD_READ_ACL, API_METHOD_UPDATE_ACL, ROLE_ROUTER}; > > it seems the hunk here would belong into proxmox 3/3 since there is no > 'tokens' module yet? yes, sorry must have messed up in my haste on wednesday, will fix that in a v2. _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel