From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC15B1FF141 for ; Tue, 05 May 2026 10:39:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B1CD1E196; Tue, 5 May 2026 10:39:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9f26ea09-ee33-44c0-90e0-dc187f12b250@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 10:39:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager/yew-widget-toolkit/yew-widget-toolkit-assets 0/8] add a new map widget for custom views To: Thomas Lamprecht , pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260504124515.2956574-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <8b9cfb15-3412-4cef-955e-7bc7df539598@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777970264337 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.050 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 6X5C3AH3AUX4VG2HRTNTP2GJUMOPDKJL X-Message-ID-Hash: 6X5C3AH3AUX4VG2HRTNTP2GJUMOPDKJL X-MailFrom: d.csapak@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 5/5/26 10:26 AM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 04.05.26 um 14:47 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> as expected, the mail with the geojson (~350k) is stuck in the moderation queue. (3/4 of datacenter manager) >> >> alternatively i can offer a local git repo to pull the diff from. >> >> I think i have to rebase the series anyway due to the recent inclusion >> of my unknown widgets patch, still waiting on a first look/review >> before sending another version though. > > Would be good to keep that in a different repo and package that we can then > depend on, let's not bloat the main git repos with such things for this. yes sounds good, does something like 'proxmox-geojson-data' sound alright? would either simply move the update script from v2 there and have some packaging around that, or include the upstream github repo as a submodule? (not sure what's better, but the data should not need frequent updates)