From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D0D1FF146 for ; Tue, 26 May 2026 14:07:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0DE1C1C922; Tue, 26 May 2026 14:07:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <9c46f1ac-cd06-43aa-ba02-07f8d11a24da@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 14:07:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 2/2] ui: move global guest panel in the top level navigation To: Lukas Wagner , Dominik Csapak , pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20260526102805.1977534-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20260526102805.1977534-2-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1779797204292 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: B2YDNUYYUFO25TO5KX7KSVEHAFDI5CLB X-Message-ID-Hash: B2YDNUYYUFO25TO5KX7KSVEHAFDI5CLB X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Am 26.05.26 um 13:04 schrieb Lukas Wagner: > On Tue May 26, 2026 at 12:27 PM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> It's a very useful view to have so don't hide it in the remotes tab >> panel. >> > > Makes sense to me, so > > Acked-by: Lukas Wagner > Just some context for posterity: I asked Dominik what he thought about this off-list because on an initial prototype I placed it there, but then moved it in the Remotes tab given that it couldn't do that much back then, it doesn't can to much more (snapshots got added since then), but that's not the whole point here - it simply is one of the most important resources PDM manages, so a "first class" navigation entry is probably fine; thx for both your opinions here. > On a tangent, at some point we probably have to rethink the tabs under > "Remotes" anyways, I think they have the potential to become quite > unwieldily once we add a couple more tabs there. Yeah, I agree, the navigation story should be reevaluated in the midterm.