From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10B51FF138
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 04 Feb 2026 11:32:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 960A0FEDB;
	Wed,  4 Feb 2026 11:33:24 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <92dba228-a1ba-4cfc-8d80-52d626b667e4@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:33:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager] pdm-api-types: Add acl feature
 to access-control
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
References: <20260202134926.403503-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
 <92a7deea-15fc-42a4-85f4-17c7fef81548@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <92a7deea-15fc-42a4-85f4-17c7fef81548@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1770201125290
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                    -0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED  0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked.  See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: KCEF5AYRJQXYLN23A2YQPM4GDRUJZMDI
X-Message-ID-Hash: KCEF5AYRJQXYLN23A2YQPM4GDRUJZMDI
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pdm-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pdm-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pdm-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 04.02.26 um 10:56 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
> @Lukas: please keep commit hygiene in mind, such things can also be fixed
> up on applying, depending on the changes needed.

Ah, you actually did do that, in that case sorry and actually huge
thanks for doing that.