From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776231FF17C for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:16:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 43E76DAB4; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:16:34 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 15:16:32 +0200 From: Wolfgang Bumiller To: Stefan Hanreich Message-ID: <7ao25uawrlgtgozwm2tyqzqhpzubeim3k7lv6dw46lsxqjovbq@grkyn7jcionz> References: <20250902140956.228031-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <20250902140956.228031-12-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> <37181b55-914e-4e8b-9026-ede451e92dab@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <37181b55-914e-4e8b-9026-ede451e92dab@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1756905377283 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-api-types v3 2/6] sdn: add list/create vnet endpoints X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Cc: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:07:45PM +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > On 9/3/25 11:36 AM, Shannon Sterz wrote: > > On Tue Sep 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM CEST, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich > >> --- > >> pve-api-types/generate.pl | 7 +++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/pve-api-types/generate.pl b/pve-api-types/generate.pl > >> index 6f55fb9..eb8436c 100644 > >> --- a/pve-api-types/generate.pl > >> +++ b/pve-api-types/generate.pl > >> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ Schema2Rust::register_format('bridge-pair' => { code => 'verifiers::verify_bridg > >> Schema2Rust::register_format('pve-task-status-type' => { regex => '^(?i:ok|error|warning|unknown)$' }); > >> > >> Schema2Rust::register_format('pve-sdn-zone-id' => { regex => '^[a-z][a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9]$' }); > >> +Schema2Rust::register_format('pve-sdn-vnet-id' => { regex => '^[a-z][a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9]$' }); > > > > nit: same as previous patch, couldn't this be `^[a-z][a-z0-9]+$`? > > I just copied this over from SDN, but I don't see any issue with > shortening it, could adjust it in pve-network while I'm at it as well, I > guess. Here as well - pve uses `/i` _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel