public inbox for pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>, pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 2/2] server: api: pve firewall: remove 'remote' parameter from overall status
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:20:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3311a75e-3468-4211-b43b-8c04778755d6@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DJXEB2SD80TX.3526YNT61XJIV@proxmox.com>



On 7/13/26 1:09 PM, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> On Wed Jul 8, 2026 at 3:36 PM CEST, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>> this is the api call for the overall status, not a specific remote, so
>> there isn't a 'remote' parameter to limit us to.
>>
>> Simply require audit on '/resource' to indicate we need resource
>> permissions.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it make more sense to filter
> the results based on which resources the user has access to, instead of
> this all-or-nothing approach? So just the usual in-code checks we have
> in place for resources, tasks, etc.?

probably yes, but this has to be done inside the api call

the way it's currently configured it'll fail for any non root@pam user
regardless of permission...

> 
>>
>> This fixes a 403 error on the firewall panel for non root@pam users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>   server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs b/server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs
>> index 5a6a209e..6c18ba10 100644
>> --- a/server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs
>> +++ b/server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs
>> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ async fn fetch_node_firewall_status(
>>           items: { type: RemoteFirewallStatus },
>>       },
>>       access: {
>> -        permission: &Permission::Privilege(&["resource", "{remote}"], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT, false),
>> +        permission: &Permission::Privilege(&["resource"], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT, false),
>>       },
>>   )]
>>   /// Get firewall status of all PVE remotes.
> 





      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 13:36 [RFC/PATCH datacenter-manager/proxmox 0/2] check privilege paths during compilation Dominik Csapak
2026-07-08 13:36 ` [RFC PATCH proxmox 1/2] router: compile time check privilege path parameters for existence Dominik Csapak
2026-07-08 13:36 ` [PATCH datacenter-manager 2/2] server: api: pve firewall: remove 'remote' parameter from overall status Dominik Csapak
2026-07-13 11:10   ` Lukas Wagner
2026-07-13 11:20     ` Dominik Csapak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3311a75e-3468-4211-b43b-8c04778755d6@proxmox.com \
    --to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --cc=l.wagner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal