From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF3651FF141 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:01:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7739D16951; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:02:54 +0100 (CET) From: Christoph Heiss To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH datacenter-manager] docs: local-zfs: fix up hardware raid warning admonition Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 17:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20260227160205.1154940-2-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1772208119936 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 1.158 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.306 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.668 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: NNIFBLWKVOISVITDKQSLUE2KZYP6UFZN X-Message-ID-Hash: NNIFBLWKVOISVITDKQSLUE2KZYP6UFZN X-MailFrom: c.heiss@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss --- Seems this instance was simply overlooked during the recent formatting fixes for this section. docs/local-zfs.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/local-zfs.rst b/docs/local-zfs.rst index 9b824cc..170ab9b 100644 --- a/docs/local-zfs.rst +++ b/docs/local-zfs.rst @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ high quality ECC RAM. If you use a dedicated cache and/or log disk, you should use an enterprise class SSD (for example, Intel SSD DC S3700 Series). This can increase the overall performance significantly. -IMPORTANT: Do not use ZFS on top of a hardware controller which has its own cache management. ZFS -needs to directly communicate with disks. An HBA adapter or something like an LSI controller flashed -in ``IT`` mode is recommended. +.. IMPORTANT:: Do not use ZFS on top of a hardware controller which has its own cache management. ZFS + needs to directly communicate with disks. An HBA adapter or something like an LSI controller flashed + in ``IT`` mode is recommended. ZFS Administration -- 2.52.0