From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B78A1FF179 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:20:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E393E337C; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:20:53 +0100 (CET) From: Gabriel Goller To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 14:20:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20251112132045.165444-5-g.goller@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251112132045.165444-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> References: <20251112132045.165444-1-g.goller@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1762953625007 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.155 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [acl.rs] Subject: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 4/9] api: allow acl paths longer than 4 segments in sdn X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" When setting granular permissions on SDN zones, vnets or controllers, the path includes both the resource type and name. This results in 5 path segments (e.g., `/sdn/zones/{zone}`), exceeding the previous 4-segment limit. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Goller --- server/src/acl.rs | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/server/src/acl.rs b/server/src/acl.rs index 52a1f972b9a9..709c7ca073b0 100644 --- a/server/src/acl.rs +++ b/server/src/acl.rs @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ impl proxmox_access_control::init::AccessControlConfig for AccessControlConfig { if components_len <= 2 { return Ok(()); } - // `/resource/{remote-id}/{resource-type=guest,storage}/{resource-id}` + // `/resource/{remote-id}/{resource-type=guest,storage}/...` match components[2] { "guest" | "storage" => { // /resource/{remote-id}/{resource-type} @@ -108,6 +108,13 @@ impl proxmox_access_control::init::AccessControlConfig for AccessControlConfig { return Ok(()); } } + "sdn" => { + // /resource/{remote-id}/sdn + // /resource/{remote-id}/sdn/{sdn-type}/{sdn-id} + if components_len <= 5 { + return Ok(()); + } + } _ => {} } } -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel