From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B654C1FF15C for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:32:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 28F80F20B; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:32:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Csapak To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20250905083253.1242076-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [mod.rs] Subject: [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager 1/2] ui: dashboard: increase max-age default to 930 seconds X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" our backend refreshes the metrics with a 15 minute interval, so using a lower max-age will always refresh it then which is not the point of the caching mechanism. Use a slightly higher value than 15 minutes so we mostly use the cached information. Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- ui/src/dashboard/mod.rs | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ui/src/dashboard/mod.rs b/ui/src/dashboard/mod.rs index cfee55b..9d65122 100644 --- a/ui/src/dashboard/mod.rs +++ b/ui/src/dashboard/mod.rs @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ mod tasks; use tasks::TaskSummary; /// The default 'max-age' parameter in seconds. -pub const DEFAULT_MAX_AGE_S: u64 = 60; +// backend refreshes resources every 15 minutes so use that +30 seconds as a buffer +pub const DEFAULT_MAX_AGE_S: u64 = 930; /// The default refresh interval pub const DEFAULT_REFRESH_INTERVAL_S: u64 = DEFAULT_MAX_AGE_S / 2; -- 2.47.2 _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel