From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B391FF168
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:05:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 29C041D78C;
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:05:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Shannon Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:04:46 +0100
Message-Id: <20250304120506.135617-2-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250304120506.135617-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20250304120506.135617-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.074 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [httpwg.org, posix.rs]
URIBL_SBL_A 0.1 Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist
[185.199.110.153, 185.199.111.153]
Subject: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox v4 01/21] time: add new
`epoch_to_http_date` helper
X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
<pdm-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pdm-devel>,
<mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pdm-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel>,
<mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
<pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pdm-devel" <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
this makes it easy to generate RFC9110 preferred HTTP Dates.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
---
proxmox-time/src/posix.rs | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/proxmox-time/src/posix.rs b/proxmox-time/src/posix.rs
index bb60ba04..79fcb1b6 100644
--- a/proxmox-time/src/posix.rs
+++ b/proxmox-time/src/posix.rs
@@ -380,6 +380,15 @@ pub fn epoch_to_rfc2822(epoch: i64) -> Result<String, Error> {
Ok(rfc2822_date)
}
+/// Convert an epoch to an RFC9110 preferred HTTP Date format.
+///
+/// see: <https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9110.html#http.date>
+pub fn epoch_to_http_date(epoch: i64) -> Result<String, Error> {
+ let gmtime = gmtime(epoch)?;
+ let locale = Locale::new(libc::LC_ALL, Locale::C)?;
+ strftime_l("%a, %d %b %Y %H:%M:%S GMT", &gmtime, &locale)
+}
+
#[test]
fn test_leap_seconds() {
let convert_reconvert = |epoch| {
--
2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel