From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 182AC1FF187
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  9 Apr 2025 13:02:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A16D3A0D6;
	Wed,  9 Apr 2025 13:02:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 13:01:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Shannon Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <2022147362.1680.1744196508347@webmail.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250403141806.402974-3-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
References: <20250403141806.402974-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
 <20250403141806.402974-3-s.sterz@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev75
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.328 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/4] access-control: add acl api
 feature
X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pdm-devel>, 
 <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pdm-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel>, 
 <mailto:pdm-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
 <pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pdm-devel" <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>


> +/// Get ACL entries, can be filter by path.
> +pub fn read_acl(
> +    path: Option<String>,
> +    exact: bool,
> +    rpcenv: &mut dyn RpcEnvironment,
> +) -> Result<Vec<AclListItem>, Error> {
> +    let auth_id = rpcenv
> +        .get_auth_id()
> +        .ok_or_else(|| format_err!("endpoint called without an auth id"))?
> +        .parse()?;
> +
> +    let top_level_privs = CachedUserInfo::new()?.lookup_privs(&auth_id, &["access", "acl"]);
> +
> +    let filter = if top_level_privs & access_conf().acl_audit_privileges() == 0 {
> +        Some(auth_id)
> +    } else {
> +        None
> +    };

As discussed offline, maybe we can use CachedUserInfo::check_privs here?


_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel