From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C861FF0AA for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1B40D21253; Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:59:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Wagner To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <20261005110049.1851404-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20261005110049.1851404-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> Subject: applied: [PATCH datacenter-manager v6 00/11] refactor and partially fix #7371 Message-Id: <179127714321.109642.5599409873093301490.b4-ty@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:59:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1791277172217 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.232 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) KAM_LOTSOFHASH 0.25 Emails with lots of hash-like gibberish RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: BOIBZH5NQCVGC4VH4B5QFVMB55DPLSFE X-Message-ID-Hash: BOIBZH5NQCVGC4VH4B5QFVMB55DPLSFE X-MailFrom: l.wagner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:57:27 +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote: > the first 6 patches are pure refactors and should not change anything > user visible, could be applied independently. > > patch 7 is to slightly change the columns for the pve tree (put the tags > with the names instead of a separate column) > > patch 8,9,11 partially fix #7371 by showing the HA maintenance status > of PVE nodes in various places. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [01/11] lib: api types: add new ResourceView type and move accessors there commit: 075d9bbe5af40fc8fe9255ef70409cd3b606cfac [02/11] lib: api types: resource: add 'node' helper to ResourceView commit: b25378749f268faca6fd5c4713d3bb8fbb2b27b1 [03/11] lib: api types: add guest specific getter to ResourceView commit: 60da675146c2d01dcc93ff55d83aae9b2d45d21f [04/11] ui: pve: factor out the pve-manager version extraction commit: 331a890c248e60a34e19a59cbcbecc1ad30cfc1b [05/11] ui: renderer: use ResourceView for rendering commit: 9a9687551020dbd4a61b32e31f3153d1511489a9 [06/11] ui: pve: tree: reuse `PveResource` for `PveTreeNode` commit: 20bf746f4b3432d58daa803e5a0d3f18cd42ea43 [07/11] ui: pve: tree: render guest tags directly after their name commit: b5620448f708b462ecbe369a16c2e489be0985f9 [08/11] ui: pve: show ha maintenance mode for nodes commit: 6ec34909c3aa6249702f5b51aca0b6fa7ab31915 [09/11] ui: pve: node selector: show maintenance badge with node name commit: d76ce5cac42e1ba6de1600349c445e8c010f0c90 [10/11] ui: pve: node selector: sort memory columns by usage not by memory size commit: 4d036d7e49406ef92bbd280041769778219a257b [11/11] ui: pve: node: show ha maintenance badge commit: 7a80356f2a3362282604895937d2f38efb49bcb0 Best regards, -- Lukas Wagner