From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE23C1FF15C for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 15:00:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB7BD1808F; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 15:02:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Lukas Wagner Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 15:01:45 +0200 Message-ID: <175465810336.1634502.13315257916647909911.b4-ty@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250807123712.218439-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> References: <20250807123712.218439-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754658099386 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pdm-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager] privileged api daemon: call fchownat with AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:37:12 +0200, Lukas Wagner wrote: > AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW makes the fchownat call fail with EINVAL, which > prevents daemon startup alltogether. The only supported flag for > fchownat is AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW [1]. If one would actually would want to > follow a symlink here one would have to pass no flag at all. > > The socket path which is fchownat'd here should not be a symlink at all, > so the safer option should be to pass AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] privileged api daemon: call fchownat with AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW commit: cc9bc95e2da6bfbf3930627ebf6dc5427beea75b _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel