From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F68E9E18D
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:38:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 22EBF261C
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:38:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:38:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 500CC44A33
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:38:03 +0100 (CET)
References: <20231121135031.171323-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
 <4c32001f-640b-4118-9d50-52a2305e1408@proxmox.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:37:20 +0100
In-reply-to: <4c32001f-640b-4118-9d50-52a2305e1408@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <s8oh6l7mw0l.fsf@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH offline-mirror] mirror: Use PathBuf instead
 of strings for paths
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:38:04 -0000

Yes, it ends up being mostly cosmetic.

Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> writes:

> Am 21/11/2023 um 14:50 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval R:
>> Joining the strings might results in a double `//` in a path. This was
>> experienced in a ticket at our customer support in the following error:
>>
>>     Error: unable to read
>>     "/var/lib/proxmox-offline-mirror/mirrors//.pool/sha256/<SOME_HASH>"
>>     - Input/output error (os error 5) after downloading =C2=B160GB of da=
ta.
>
>
> I mean, that's an example where one can view this slightly cosmetic issue,
> not really the cause for the actual error, like your message tends to
> suggest, I hope?!


--
Maximiliano