From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630DA1FF17C for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 95E981040B; Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:09:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <175327187456.3485344.14076148566441093063.b4-ty@proxmox.com> (Thomas Lamprecht's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:57:56 +0200") References: <20250723115015.711300-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> <175327187456.3485344.14076148566441093063.b4-ty@proxmox.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.9; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 14:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753272528223 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.096 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: backup writer: make no-cache parameter backwards compatible X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pbs-devel" Thomas Lamprecht writes: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:50:15 +0200, Christian Ebner wrote: >> Commit 90723828 ("api: backup: add no-cache flag to bypass local >> datastore cache") introduced the additional flag to request bypassing >> of the datastore cache by the Proxmox Backup Server. >> >> The flag is however included in the backup api request parameters, >> which is incompatible with older version of the server. >> >> [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/1] client: backup writer: make no-cache parameter backwards compatible > commit: c763a0e9dff12acda8a84c70df08e637ba2a67bf A bit late, but I can confirm this fixes encrypted backups of containers (against a pbs server running 3.4.3) in pve for me. -- Maximiliano _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel