From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4297CA0B for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 118501F2D4 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3E20040953; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:30:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/103.0 Content-Language: en-GB To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , dea , Mark Schouten References: <3283c4b8-7df3-8cd8-2886-b6d14ee3633b@proxmox.com> <4a05245f-6bd1-02da-f600-9976c4f1abf5@proxmox.com> <961f333d-9b92-0dc9-52b5-5664a37d47e5@proxmox.com> <0bdcf88d-a22d-117b-269f-c765681d67c7@corep.it> <8da163af-207a-af23-4f2b-c68c226b4d5c@corep.it> <26375c15-9c68-df28-707f-3e19fb903451@corep.it> From: Thomas Lamprecht In-Reply-To: <26375c15-9c68-df28-707f-3e19fb903451@corep.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Scheduler causing connectivity issues? X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:30:56 -0000 Am 17/07/2022 um 17:04 schrieb dea: >=20 > after=C2=A0upgrade=C2=A0to=C2=A02.2-4=C2=A0connection=C2=A0problem=C2=A0= persist: FYI, there's proxmox-backup-server version 2.2.5-1, it includes a stop ga= p [0] for an issue that could be the one affecting your system, the difference betw= een the previous improvements is that this doesn't necessarily has to stem from a= system with high load (IO pressure). It's sadly hard to create a synthetic reproducer and thus also hard to kn= ow for sure that this one addresses the regression in the various environments PBS ru= ns in, so we'd appreciate feedback on that. That package is available on pbstest as of now. [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=3Dproxmox-backup.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3Dc= 2206e21e0f27fbb7610180fc9dc3cb2fe1c4c16 cheers, Thomas