From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 048DD7B7B2 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E41B61BD17 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kerio.tuxis.nl (alrami.saas.tuxis.net [31.3.111.57]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:45:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tuxis.nl; s=mail; h=from:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=IlLbZ44rAXRIO/ft9vDH7tEsxC8xcZpDFv5SONHJI+U=; b=jAia3gyonzkZlQM9i3aC/cwg7Z0L7oELRQ4qBq7nTS/HZI2iN2bD0qxC5qLj102GfiGJZ6VHWL4dZ qDYYgMEdxBuJuMPGB7crk6nM1uJHob7omIC6bgTpxLcS4v7VFso5aYmGtTm4LD+3D/5SuglDjELJhW PNwvWJkPpWn68UkmFFY3IoJgNtMQUQ1BMnwY7oacT5NnC0UhMCXMS8cnRzp0vZmasWt6QDNk/m3b1y CEW0vNul91GYvDMA9xr60/7bUFhuvf9INu2tX5xXKl9f5z7Y5xc65RQL2k3qs4u0Yow83E0kasowur mxCmpxZdPMHnRoTAXUMRAD6wC7e9cZw== X-Footer: dHV4aXMubmw= Received: from [IPv6:2a03:7900:64::1000] ([2a03:7900:64::1000]) (authenticated user mark@tuxis.nl) by kerio.tuxis.nl (Kerio Connect 9.4.1 patch 1) with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:45:06 +0200 From: "Mark Schouten" To: "Thomas Lamprecht" , "Proxmox Backup Server development discussion" Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:44:59 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: "Mark Schouten" User-Agent: eM_Client/9.0.1755.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.029 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Scheduler causing connectivity issues? X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:45:44 -0000 Hi, >>Hope you guys can find something.. If I need to debug anything, let me kn= ow! > >Thanks for the info, this already helps quite a bit. We'll look into it an= d re-check >with you if we need more info. > Any chance you can think of a workaround for the time being, other than=20 downgrading? =E2=80=94 Mark Schouten, CTO Tuxis B.V. mark@tuxis.nl