From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE40070F49 for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CE83525F3C for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 45CC825F31 for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A7C9B43642; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 10:20:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/101.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <20220517065215.327699-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <20220517065215.327699-4-d.csapak@proxmox.com> <93d352ce-fe3c-7eee-4b07-b217df86b376@proxmox.com> From: Dominik Csapak In-Reply-To: <93d352ce-fe3c-7eee-4b07-b217df86b376@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.320 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.401 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 4/5] ui: datastore/Summary: change storage axis to power of two X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 08:20:44 -0000 On 5/17/22 10:09, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Am 5/17/22 um 08:52 schrieb Dominik Csapak: >> so that the unit is the same as in the overview panel on the same page >> > > This missed the administration Server Status RRD for the root disk, but actually > this needs to be the other way around, I switched to power of two for all memory > graphs in PVE 7.0 and the storage one to power of ten, at least the pve storages, > the root HD one in the node summary is still wrong (will fix). > > yeah you're right, i forgot about the administration rrd panels. any reason why we use different units for disk vs memory? imho storage also often uses binary units. (`lvs`/`lsblk` uses that in it's default output, we use it for vm/ct disks, etc.)