From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pbs-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7871FF140
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:51:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC65613901;
	Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:51:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <eecefc4f-e1f1-446c-9281-df52398e1605@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:50:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup v2] acme: partially fix #6372: scale
 certificate renewal checks by lifetime
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>,
 Manuel Federanko <m.federanko@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20260423134607.105229-2-m.federanko@proxmox.com>
 <1777019789.wslwp6i17e.astroid@yuna.none>
 <7c18fb73-e517-42a6-b5fe-15dbe4c2412f@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <7c18fb73-e517-42a6-b5fe-15dbe4c2412f@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2
X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1777027768399
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: O6LETLNL4GAVIJNR4L3HUFSHOTMLLTX6
X-Message-ID-Hash: O6LETLNL4GAVIJNR4L3HUFSHOTMLLTX6
X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pbs-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pbs-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

Am 24.04.26 um 12:36 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
> Am 24.04.26 um 10:35 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
>> seems like v1 of this got applied (with some follow-ups), would you mind
>> checking if rebasing the diff between v1 and v2 still makes sense?
> Argh, b4 should have pulled in the newer revision in any case, I'll
> recheck what was going on here.
> 
Probably just timing, but b4 still isn't able to find v2, might be
due to Manuel not sending out a superseded reply to the old submission
that points to the new one, which then made b4 not recognize the newer
revision.