From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A257469094
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:18:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 996BFC75F
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:18:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 38F9CC76B
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:18:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F1F9441EF1
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:18:03 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
References: <36cbccc4-340b-933b-63d7-921bc332a25b@proxmox.com>
 <20201112091254.29059-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <eb5fa872-c15d-b57f-4e05-6a9fd2a60539@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:18:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201112091254.29059-1-s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.097 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [proxmox-backup-manager.rs, apt.rs]
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] apt: use typed response
 for get_versions
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:18:04 -0000

On 12.11.20 10:12, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> ...and cleanup get_versions for manager CLI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> No need to return an untyped Value, especially if we want to further work with
> it, so how about this for a cleanup?
> 
>  src/api2/node/apt.rs              |  4 ++--
>  src/bin/proxmox-backup-manager.rs | 10 ++--------
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
>

much nicer, and the obvious solution; I'd guess it was a bit to late for me yesterday ^^ 

applied, thanks!