From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B556160570
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:48:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ABE861573
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:48:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 349EE1560
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:48:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0DB674579B;
 Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:47:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <ead68828-7bde-6495-8534-4df91e0521b0@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:47:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:96.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/96.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, David Lawley <davel@upilab.com>
References: <58e99d25-32de-7446-64b4-b6a3262f648c@upilab.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <58e99d25-32de-7446-64b4-b6a3262f648c@upilab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.059 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] PBS and multiple clsuters
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 11:48:04 -0000

On 12.01.22 12:14, David Lawley wrote:
> Just a note and others may have found a way to work with this.. And I feel sure 
> its nothing that has gone unnoticed.
> 
> If I have 2 or more proxmox environments, you can have multiple VMs with same 
> name, such as vm/102
> 
> Would be nice to have a method to determine what cluster the backup belongs to.
> 
> I have restored a VM to the wrong cluster before.
> 

Not really sure what the actual question or statement here is, but a namespace
feature is on the roadmap:

https://pbs.proxmox.com/wiki/index.php/Roadmap#Roadmap

cheers,
Thomas