From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24397C60A for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:43:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D51662A8DD for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:43:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.corep.it (mail.corep.it [93.186.252.128]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:43:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:43:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.0.2 From: dea To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox Backup Server development discussion , Mark Schouten Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion References: <3283c4b8-7df3-8cd8-2886-b6d14ee3633b@proxmox.com> <4a05245f-6bd1-02da-f600-9976c4f1abf5@proxmox.com> <961f333d-9b92-0dc9-52b5-5664a37d47e5@proxmox.com> <0bdcf88d-a22d-117b-269f-c765681d67c7@corep.it> <8da163af-207a-af23-4f2b-c68c226b4d5c@corep.it> In-Reply-To: <8da163af-207a-af23-4f2b-c68c226b4d5c@corep.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.158 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Scheduler causing connectivity issues? X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:43:56 -0000 ... no... better than before, much better, but I still have network holes. Traffic in sync at 250 mbps ... I see that it collapses to zero, I try to log into the console .. nothing, then I see that the traffic resumes and then yes, it authenticates me immediately. There are still some holes in the network. Il 15/07/22 15:24, dea ha scritto: > > After reboot with version 2.2-4 everything seems OK. I keep you > updated in case there are any problems. > > THANK YOU > > > Il 15/07/22 15:02, dea ha scritto: >> retry to upgrade 2.2-1->2.2-4 and reboot... >> >> >> Il 15/07/22 14:57, Thomas Lamprecht ha scritto: >>> Am 15/07/2022 um 14:01 schrieb dea: >>>> Mmmmm no, for me the same problem. >>>> >>>> Rollback 2.2.4 -> 2.2.1 and works great. >>>> >>>> >>> how do you test? >>> >>> did you reboot in between or dropped the page cache? >>> >>> also what is your output for the requested info: >>> >>> Am 13/07/2022 um 10:14 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: >>>> FWIW, it would be still interesting to see a few metrics/CLI >>>> outputs from an affected >>>> system to hopefully ensure that there's nothing additional to that >>>> problem. >>>> >>>> - `head /proc/pressure/*` for some general info if the system is >>>> overloaded >>>> - `ls /var/lib/proxmox-backup/jobstates` just out of interest >>>> - `ss -tlpn` to see if another (old) proxy process is still accepting >>>> - `uptime` >>> `lscpu` and `free` would be good to know too. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pbs-devel mailing list >> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel > > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel