From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9420C978AA
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:26:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 725291970
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:26:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:26:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9888741DBD
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:26:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <e3d65bbd-20fd-474e-9101-d66d83579879@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:26:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>,
 Proxmox Backup Server development discussion <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20240416152416.96561-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <20240416152416.96561-7-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
 <fd467cef-4e5e-4994-8ea2-66c39069b092@proxmox.com>
 <D0MAB31HNIDY.1QYQ9HLIY8HN6@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0MAB31HNIDY.1QYQ9HLIY8HN6@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v4 06/22] api2: admin: add
 (un)mount endpoint for removable datastores
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:26:05 -0000

On 4/17/24 11:19, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> this also happens when creating a datastore, so creating one would fail
> with mentioning a store that doesn't exist, which might be a little
> weird. but no hard feelings

But then it would simply state that the device with `uuid` intended to 
be used for the `store` (which will be created) is already mounted. Not 
that the datastore is already there. So not really wrong in my opinion.